Adjudication
Adjudication is the process of reviewing a completed background investigation and making a determination about an individual's eligibility for a security clearance. Adjudicators weigh the facts against established guidelines to decide whether granting access would pose an unacceptable risk to national security.
Quick Facts
| Performed by | Adjudicators at CAF or agency security offices |
| Input | Completed background investigation |
| Standard | SEAD 4 Adjudicative Guidelines |
| Approach | Whole-person concept |
| Outcomes | Grant, deny, or require additional information |
The Adjudication Process
After your investigation is complete[1]:
- Case assignment - Investigation file goes to adjudicator
- Review - Adjudicator examines all collected information
- Analysis - Facts compared against adjudicative guidelines
- Whole-person evaluation - Considering all factors together
- Decision - Eligibility granted, denied, or more info needed
Adjudicative Guidelines
Adjudicators apply the national security adjudicative guidelines (SEAD 4), which cover 13 areas[2]:
- Allegiance to the United States
- Foreign influence
- Foreign preference
- Sexual behavior
- Personal conduct
- Financial considerations
- Alcohol consumption
- Drug involvement and substance misuse
- Psychological conditions
- Criminal conduct
- Handling protected information
- Outside activities
- Use of information technology
Each guideline lists conditions that raise concerns and conditions that may mitigate those concerns.
The Whole-Person Concept
Adjudication is not a checklist - adjudicators consider[4]:
- The nature and seriousness of the conduct
- The circumstances surrounding the conduct
- How recent the conduct was
- Age and maturity at the time
- Voluntariness of participation
- Rehabilitation and behavioral changes
- Motivation for the conduct
- Likelihood of continuation or recurrence
A single issue may not be disqualifying if other factors are favorable[3].
Possible Outcomes
Favorable determination
- Clearance eligibility granted
- You can be read in to classified programs
Statement of Reasons (SOR)
- Adjudicator has concerns
- You receive written notice of issues
- Opportunity to respond before final decision
Denial
- Clearance eligibility not granted
- Appeal rights typically available
Revocation
- For current clearance holders
- Based on new information or changed circumstances
Responding to Concerns
If adjudicators have questions, you may[1]:
- Be asked to provide additional documentation
- Receive a Statement of Reasons requiring response
- Have opportunity to explain or provide context
- Submit evidence of rehabilitation or mitigation
Timely, thorough responses improve outcomes.
Who Adjudicates
DoD Consolidated Adjudications Facility (CAF)
- Handles most DoD and contractor clearances
- Centralized processing
Agency-specific offices
- Intelligence community agencies often have their own adjudicators
- May apply additional agency-specific criteria
Related
- Background Investigation
- Mitigating Factors
- Suitability vs. Clearance
- PSAB (Personnel Security Appeals Board)
- Suspension / Revocation
References
- ^ Adjudications. Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency. Accessed 2026-01-10.
- ^ SEAD 4: National Security Adjudicative Guidelines. Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Accessed 2026-01-08.
- ^ Security Clearance Process: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions. Congressional Research Service. Accessed 2026-01-10.
- ^ Executive Order 12968: Access to Classified Information. National Archives. Accessed 2026-01-08.